+xTim Dawson - 12/31/2016 3:14:47 PMIncorrect. The NOTAM has been published with a radius of 9.3km and that is therefore what we display. It is up to the publisher of the NOTAM to decide what effective radius it has; you would have to ask them why they chose this value given what the text of the NOTAM says.
+xgiannisd - 1/4/2017 5:26:40 PM+xTim Dawson - 12/31/2016 3:14:47 PMIncorrect. The NOTAM has been published with a radius of 9.3km and that is therefore what we display. It is up to the publisher of the NOTAM to decide what effective radius it has; you would have to ask them why they chose this value given what the text of the NOTAM says.Tim, but the notam says circle of radius 500,0 mt, do you know the Notam number ? so I can double check ?regards,
+xgiannisd - 1/4/2017 5:47:59 PM+xTim Dawson - 12/31/2016 3:14:47 PMIncorrect. The NOTAM has been published with a radius of 9.3km and that is therefore what we display. It is up to the publisher of the NOTAM to decide what effective radius it has; you would have to ask them why they chose this value given what the text of the NOTAM says.Tim, but the notam says circle of radius 500,0 mt, do you know the Notam number ? so I can double check ?regards, +xgiannisd - 1/4/2017 5:26:40 PM+xTim Dawson - 12/31/2016 3:14:47 PMIncorrect. The NOTAM has been published with a radius of 9.3km and that is therefore what we display. It is up to the publisher of the NOTAM to decide what effective radius it has; you would have to ask them why they chose this value given what the text of the NOTAM says.Tim, but the notam says circle of radius 500,0 mt, do you know the Notam number ? so I can double check ?regards, attached ENR page as per NOTAM